4.4 Article

Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1089-1095

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002

关键词

Children; Pain intensity; Assessment; Numerical rating scale

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [SEJ2006-15247/PSIC, SEJ2006-1430/PSIC]
  2. Marato de TV3 Foundation [07/234]
  3. Fundacio Agrupacio Mutua
  4. Department of Universities
  5. Research and the Information Society of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan Government)
  6. European Social Fund
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) when used to assess pediatric pain intensity. We performed two studies: 175 schoolchildren, aged 8-12, participated in Study 1 and 63 children undergoing surgery and aged 6-16, participated in Study 2. The NRS-11 showed (a) adequate convergent construct validity when correlated with the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R; r(1) = 0.78, r(2) = 0.93); (b) adequate discriminant validity in relation to measures of pain-related affect (z(1) = 3.55, z(2) = 7.62) and disability (z(1) = 7.62, z(2) = 6.83); and (c) adequate criterion-related validity using measures of pain-related affect (r(1) = .58, r(2) = .66), disability (r(1) = 0.22, r(2) = .39), and quality of life (r(2) = -.46). Schoolchildren were asked whether they preferred using the NRS-11 or the FPS-R when reporting the intensity of their pain. While both sexes and both the younger and older age groups preferred the FPS-R, this preference was more marked among girls and younger children. The NRS-11 has shown an acceptable level of validity for assessing pain intensity in both samples. however, additional research is needed in order to fully clarify the lower age limit in which the NRS-11 can be used. (C) 2009 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据