4.4 Article

Activating endogenous visceral pain modulation: A comparison of heterotopic stimulation methods in healthy controls

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 836-842

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.09.015

关键词

Endogenous pain modulation; Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls DNIC; Visceral pain; Pain inhibition; Irritable Bowel Syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All sensory input underlies modulation by endogenous central nervous system pathways. Dysfunctional endogenous pain modulation has been demonstrated in central sensitization and in several pain syndromes, including Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Activation of endogenous visceral pain modulation by heterotopic stimulation was compared using different methods. Rectal electrical or distension pain alone or with simultaneous (i.e. heterotopic) noxious hand or foot cold stimulation were investigated in randomized sequence in 14 male and 1 female healthy subjects. Mean pain intensities on a visual analogue scale of 0-100 (95% CI) during tonic rectal electrical and distension stimulation alone were 64 (52-76) and 55 (39-71), respectively. Rectal distension pain decreased by 36% (18-55) with simultaneous hand and by 45% (24-66) with simultaneous foot cold pain. Rectal electrical pain decreased by 45% (29-61) during hand and by 46% (28-64) during foot cold pain. Facilitation, i.e. increased rectal pain during heterotopic stimulation was observed in only 1 of 60 stimulation runs. Potent and consistent activation of endogenous visceral pain inhibition was achieved with heterotopic cold pain limb stimulation. Somato-visceral convergence did not affect the effectiveness of induction of endogenous visceral pain inhibition in healthy subjects, as hand and foot heterotopic stimulation resulted in similar pain inhibition. Pain facilitation, as shown earlier in IBS patients, was not evident in healthy controls. 2008 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据