4.2 Article

Cerebral palsy in children born after in vitro fertilization. Is the risk decreasing?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 526-530

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.03.007

关键词

Cerebral palsy; In vitro fertilization; Neonatal conditions; Preterm birth

资金

  1. Evy and Gunnar Sandberg Foundation, Lund, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Infants born after in vitro fertilization (IVF) differ from spontaneously conceived infants in a number of aspects which could increase the risk for future cerebral palsy (CP), e.g., multiple births, preterm births, neonatal complications. Aims: To follow up children conceived by IVF with respect to risk for CP. Methods: Infants born after IVF were identified from all IVF clinics in Sweden 1982-2007. Perinatal characteristics were obtained by linkage with the Medical Birth Register. The presence of CP in children born after IVF and in other children was identified from the Patient Register which contains diagnoses given at hospitalizations or specialist outpatient clinics. The risk for CP after IVF was studied after adjustment for year of birth, maternal age, parity, and smoking, all factors which co-vary both with IVF and with CP. Stratification was made for singletons and multiple births and for various neonatal outcomes. Results: The adjusted odds ratio for CP after IVF was 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.52-2.13), lower and not statistically significant when singletons or when unlike-sexed twins were analyzed. Stratification for various neonatal characteristics also reduced odds ratios to non-significant levels. For the last few years of the study (2004-2007) when the twinning rate after IVF was <10%, the odds ratio for CP was 0.97 (95% CI 0.57-1.66). Conclusions: The moderately increased risk for CP was most likely a consequence of an increased risk of neonatal morbidity, notably associated with multiple births. (C) 2010 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据