4.5 Review

Cognitive Training for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactiviiy Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.12.010

关键词

ADHD; nonpharmacological; working memory; executive functions; evidence-based psychiatry

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  2. Consejeria de Salud Junta de Andalucia
  3. Gobierno de Navarra (Beca Jeronimo Ayanz)
  4. Fundacion Alicia Koplowitz
  5. Shire
  6. European Union (EU FP7 Programme)
  7. US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  8. German Federal Ministry of Health/Regulatory Agency (BMG/BfArM)
  9. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  10. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  11. Volkswagen Foundation
  12. Ferring
  13. Janssen-Cilag
  14. Eli Lilly and Co.
  15. Otsuka
  16. Theravance
  17. AstraZeneca
  18. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  19. Medice
  20. Neuroconn
  21. Novartis
  22. EU (FP7 Programme)
  23. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  24. Wellcome Trust
  25. NIHR
  26. Department of Health UK
  27. Italian National Institute of Health
  28. Sardinian Secretary of Public Health
  29. Vifor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The authors performed meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to examine the effects of cognitive training on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, neuropsychological deficits, and academic skills in children/adolescents with ADHD. Method: The authors searched Pubmed, Ovid, Web of Science, ERIC, and CINTAHAL databases through May 18, 2014. Data were aggregated using random-effects models. Studies were evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Sixteen of 695 nonduplicate records were analyzed (759 children with ADHD). When all types of training were considered together, there were significant effects on total ADHD (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.09-0.66) and inattentive symptoms (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.14-0.80) for reports by raters most proximal to the treatment setting (i.e., typically unblinded). These figures decreased substantially when the outcomes were provided by probably blinded raters (ADHD total: SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.01-0.40; inattention: SMD = 0.32, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.66). Effects on hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms were not significant. There were significant effects on laboratory tests of working memory (verbal: SMD = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.24-0.80; visual: SMD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23-0.70) and parent ratings of executive function (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.08-0.61). Effects on academic performance were not statistically significant. There were no effects of working memory training, specifically on ADHD symptoms. Interventions targeting multiple neuropsychological deficits had large effects on ADHD symptoms rated by most proximal assessors (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.46-1.12). Conclusion: Despite improving working memory performance, cognitive training had limited effects on ADHD symptoms according to assessments based on blinded measures. Approaches targeting multiple neuropsychological processes may optimize the transfer of effects from cognitive deficits to clinical symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据