4.1 Article

Reinnervated nerves contribute to the secretion function and regeneration of denervated submandibular glands in rabbits

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 372-381

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12154

关键词

receptor; regeneration; reinnervation; secretion; submandibular gland

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371160, 81172566, 81302367, 81372884]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [2013-1792]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project [2012B031800036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the contribution of redistributed nerves in the secretory function and regeneration of a denervated submandibular gland (SMG). The postganglionic parasympathetic and sympathetic denervated SMGs of rabbits were wrapped in polyester or acellular dermal matrices to block nerve regeneration either partially or completely. Submandibular glands were removed 4, 8, 16, and 24wk after the operation and examined histologically. Furthermore, the aquaporin-5 (AQP5), muscarinic-3 (M3), and 1-adrenergic receptors were evaluated by immunofluorescence and western blot analysis. After denervation, salivary flow was decreased and acinar cells were atrophic, and the expression levels of the M3, 1-adrenergic, and AQP5 receptors were decreased. However, both impaired secretion function and atrophic parenchyma were gradually ameliorated with the growing redistribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves. Apoptosis was markedly inhibited and expression of the M3, 1-adrenergic, and AQP5 receptors was increased after reinnervation. In contrast, SMGs without reinnervated nerves maintained hyposecretion and atrophic parenchyma. In conclusion, reinnervated nerves in a rabbit's denervated SMG played an important role in the secretion function and regeneration of SMGs via up-regulation of the expression of neurotransmitter receptors and AQP5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据