4.7 Article

Maximizing system availability through joint decision on component redundancy and spares inventory

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 237, 期 1, 页码 164-176

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.031

关键词

Repairable k-out-of-n : G system; Operational availability; Redundancy allocation; Spare parts logistics; Performance-based contracting

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1238304]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1238304] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a repairable k-out-of-n : G system consisting of line-replaceable units, its operational availability depends on component reliability, its redundancy level, and spare parts availability. As a result, it is important to consider redundancy allocation and spare parts provisioning simultaneously in maximizing the system's operational availability. In prior studies, however, these important aspects are often handled separately in the areas of reliability engineering and spare parts logistics. In this paper, we study a collection of operational availability maximization problems, in which the component redundancy and the spares stocking quantities are to be determined simultaneously under economic and physical constraints. To solve this type of problem, continuous-time Markov chain models are developed first for a single repairable k-out-of-n : G system under different shut-off rules, and some important properties of the corresponding operational availability and spare parts availability are derived. Then, we extend the models to series systems consisting of multiple repairable k-out-of-n : G subsystems. The related optimization problems are reformulated as binary integer linear programs and solved using a branch- and-bound method. Numerical examples, including a real-world application of automatic test equipment, are presented to illustrate this integrated product-service solution and to offer valuable managerial insights. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据