4.7 Article

Synthetic indicators of mutual funds' environmental responsibility: An application of the Reference Point Method

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 236, 期 1, 页码 313-325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.031

关键词

Socially Responsible Investment; Environment; Equity mutual funds evaluation; Multicriteria decision analysis; Reference Point Method; Synthetic indicators

资金

  1. Regional Government of Andalucia [SEJ-445, PR09-FQM-5001]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [ECO2011-28927, MTM2010-14992]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) is broadly defined as an investment process that integrates not only financial but also social, environmental, and ethical (SEE) considerations into investment decision making. SRI has grown rapidly around the world in the last decades. In the last years, given the causes of the 2008 financial crisis, ethical, social, environmental and governance concerns have become even more relevant investment decision criteria. However, while a diverse set of models have been developed to support investment decision-making based on financial criteria, models including also social responsibility criteria are rather scarce. The aim of this paper, in which we focus on the environmental dimension, is to assist individual investors in their investment decisions providing them with a synthetic indicator of mutual funds' environmental responsibility, which is by nature a multicriteria concept and therefore multicriteria techniques are to be used to measure it. The proposed approach is based on the double (reservation-aspiration) Reference Point Method. This scheme is applied to each fund of a randomly selected set of U.S. equity mutual funds, in order to determine, on the basis of a given set of indicators, a pair of synthetic indicators that measure the weak and the strong environmental responsibility degree of each mutual fund, relying on the particular preferences of the investor. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据