4.5 Article

Quality of life, symptom experience and distress of lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 400-409

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.01.003

关键词

Lung cancer; Quality of life; Symptoms; Chemotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diagnosis of lung cancer in the advanced stage of Illness the poor prognosis associated with the disease and the side effects of chemotherapy all have an impact on various dimensions of quality of life (QoL) The purpose of the research The current study was designed to describe the QoL and symptom distress of lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and to explore the relationships between demographic/treatment-related characteristics and QoL Methods and sample The sample consisted of 154 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy The symptom experiences and QoL of lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy were evaluated using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and Quality of Life Index - Cancer Version Results The lung cancer patients had low QoL scores The scores on the Health and Functioning subscale were the lowest (20 33 +/- 5 59) while those of the Family subscale were the highest (27 66 +/- 2 77) The most common physical symptoms experienced by lung cancer patients were lack of energy coughing pain lack of appetite and nausea while the psychological symptoms were feeling nervous difficulty sleeping feeling sad and worrying There was a negative relationship between the symptom distress and quality of life scores (r = -045 p < 0 000) Females and those with low income levels and performance status experienced greater symptom distress Conclusions Lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy suffer many limitations due to the symptoms and disruptions to their QoL, arising from both the disease process and its treatment Lung cancer patients need to be assessed regularly and supported (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据