4.3 Article

Atazanavir in pregnancy: impact on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.005

关键词

HIV; Pregnancy; Atazanavir; Placental transfer; Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

资金

  1. French National Agency for AIDS and Viral Hepatitis Research (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hepatites virales, ANRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the impact on the neonate of maternal antiretroviral therapy with atazanavir (ATV). Study design: An observational study of 22 HIV-infected women receiving, for clinical indications, antiretroviral therapy with ATV 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg during pregnancy and their 23 HIV infants (including a twin pair). Results: Mothers had received ATV for a median duration of 19 months [range 3-49] by delivery. At delivery, plasma HIV-RNA was <40 copies/mL in all patients. Liver enzymes were normal in 19/22 patients, but one woman had grade 3-4 liver toxicity. Maternal serum bilirubin concentrations were above the upper limit of normal in most patients, with grade 3 toxicity in 5 patients. All but one woman had trough ATV concentrations during pregnancy above the minimum effective concentration. The median cord blood AN concentration was 130 ng/mL [range <30-758]; the cord/maternal ratio was 21%. All neonates were born at term [median 38.2 weeks]. Three neonates had mildly elevated AST transaminase levels. Bilirubin concentrations at birth were significantly higher than maternal concentrations, with a median of 44 mu m/L [range 24-129]; values on days 2-3 were 63 [8-212]. Five neonates had jaundice requiring phototherapy, without liver damage, and recovered without sequelae. Conclusion: Neonates whose mothers were treated with AN should be monitored for hyperbilirubinemia, which may be due to placental transfer of unconjugated bilirubin from the mother and/or a direct effect of transplacental NW on bilirubin metabolism in the fetus. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据