4.3 Article

Adenomyosis and junctional zone changes in patients with endometriosis

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.003

关键词

Adenomyosis; Endometriosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate image findings in the junctional zone (JZ) in patients with endometriosis and correlate with image findings of adenomyosis. To attempt a correlation of the degree of adenomyotic infiltration with the degree of infiltration and stage of endometriosis. Study design: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the uterus was performed in 153 women with suspected deeply infiltrating endometriosis and planned surgery, and in a reference group of 129 women without endometriosis, verified during hysterectomy. Changes in the JZ and endometriosis in the pelvis were described in detail. Diagnosis of adenomyosis at MRI was based on optimal criteria derived from the hysterectomy control group. The stage of endometriosis (AFS stage) was determined during surgery. Results: In the group of women with endometriosis 34.6% had adenomyosis compared with 19.4% in the reference group (p <0.05). More women with endometriosis (39.9%) had an irregular JZ compared to 22.5% in the reference group (p < 0.01). Among women with severe endometriosis (AFS stage IV) 42.8% had adenomyosis compared to 29.4% in the women with other stages of endometriosis (AFS stages I + II + III) (p = 0.10). More women with severe endometriosis (AFS stage IV) had deeper wall invasion of adenomyosis (p > 0.05) but the presence of deep infiltrative rectovaginal endometriosis and the size of infiltration were not correlated to adenomyosis or depth of infiltration of adenomyosis. Conclusions: In a group of young women with severe symptomatic endometriosis and planned surgery a systematic evaluation of the JZ revealed that one third had uterine adenomyosis, but the invasive potential of endometrial cells in the uterus and in the peritoneum corresponded only to a limited degree. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据