4.3 Article

The association of maternal and fetal glucose homeostasis with fetal adiposity and birthweight

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.022

关键词

Birthweight; Fetal adiposity; Glucose

资金

  1. Health Research Board of Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the association between maternal and fetal glucose levels and fetal adiposity and infant birthweight. Study design: This is a prospective study of 479 healthy, non-diabetic mother and infant pairs attending the National Maternity Hospital in Ireland. Fasting glucose was measured in early pregnancy (11.8 +/- 2.3 weeks). At 28 weeks gestation a repeat fasting glucose was measured and 1 h glucose challenge testing (1 h GCT) was performed. At 34 weeks gestation (33 + 5-34 + 5 weeks) fetal growth and fetal anterior abdominal wall width, a marker of fetal adiposity, were measured. At delivery cord glucose was measured and neonatal anthropometry recorded. Results: There was a positive correlation between fasting glucose concentration during pregnancy and both infant birthweight and fetal anterior abdominal wall width at 34 weeks gestation. The incidence of macrosomia (birthweight > 4.5 kg) was significantly greater for maternal and cord blood glucose levels in the highest quartile compared to the lowest quartile (20.7% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.05 in the first trimester, 21.3% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.05, at 28 weeks, and 33.3% vs. 10%, p < 0.05, in cord blood). Maternal glucose concentrations at each time point, though not cord glucose, were related to early pregnancy maternal body mass index (r = 0.19, p < 0.001 in first trimester, r = 0.25, p < 0.001 at 28 weeks, r = 0.15, p < 0.01 with 1 h GCT). Conclusion: Maternal glucose homeostasis is an important determinant of fetal size. We have shown that even small variations in fasting glucose concentrations can influence fetal growth and adiposity. This effect is seen from the first trimester and maintained until delivery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据