4.3 Article

Association of extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD3) Ala40Thr gene polymorphism with pre-eclampsia complicated by severe fetal growth restriction

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.10.014

关键词

SOD3; Polymorphism; Association study; Pre-eclampsia; Fetal growth restriction

资金

  1. Ministry of Health of Hungary [ETT 225/06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Placental and systemic oxidative stress with an imbalance in the oxidant/antioxidant activity seems to play a central role in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. The aim of our study was to examine whether two missense polymorphisms of the extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD3) gene (Arg213Gly and Ala40Thr) are associated with pre-eclampsia in a Caucasian population from Hungary. Study design: One hundred and fifty-nine pre-eclamptic patients and 114 normotensive, healthy pregnant women were involved in this case-control study. The SOD3 Arg213Gly and Ala40Thr genotypes were determined using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and allele-specific amplification methods. Results: The Arg213Gly variant was not detected in our population. There were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of the SOD3 Ala40Thr polymorphism between pre-eclamptic patients and control subjects. However, the mutant allele carriers of this polymorphism showed an increased risk for severe fetal growth restriction-complicated pre-eclampsia, which was independent of maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, primiparity and smoking status (OR: 6.07, 95% CI: 1.33-27.8, p = 0.020; adjusted OR: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.03-23.2, p = 0.046). Conclusion: Our results suggest a role of SOD3 Ala40Thr single nucleotide polymorphism in the risk of severe fetal growth restriction-complicated pre-eclampsia. However, further studies are needed with a larger sample size to confirm our findings and to explore the exact molecular basis of this observation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据