4.5 Article

Gallic acid, a common dietary phenolic protects against high fat diet induced DNA damage

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 58, 期 6, 页码 2315-2326

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-018-1782-2

关键词

High fat diet; Obesity; DNA damage; Gallic acid; Inflammation

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) - Austrian Science Funds (Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF)) [AP2658721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Aim of the study was to find out if gallic acid (GA), a common phenolic in plant foods, prevents obesity induced DNA damage which plays a key role in the induction of overweight associated cancer. Methods Male and female C57BL6/J mice were fed with a low fat or a high fat diet (HFD). The HFD group received different doses GA (0, 2.6-20 mg/kg b.w./day) in the drinking water for 1 week. Subsequently, alterations of the genetic stability in blood and inner organs were monitored in single cell gel electrophoresis assays. To elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms: oxidized DNA bases, alterations of the redox status, lipid and glucose metabolism, cytokine levels and hepatic NF-kappa B activity were monitored. Results HFD fed animals had higher body weights; increased DNA damage and oxidation of DNA bases damage were detected in colon, liver and brain but not in blood and white adipose tissue. Furthermore, elevated concentrations of insulin, glucose, triglycerides, MCP-1, TNF-alpha and NF-kappa B activity were observed in this group. Small amounts of GA, in the range of human consumption, caused DNA protection and reduced oxidation of DNA bases, as well as biochemical and inflammatory parameters. Conclusions Obese animals have increased DNA damage due to oxidation of DNA bases. This effect is probably caused by increased levels of glucose and insulin. The effects of GA can be explained by its hypoglycaemic properties and indicate that the consumption of GA-rich foods prevents adverse health effects in obese individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据