4.7 Article

Outcome and toxicity of salvage therapy with 177Lu-octreotate in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2547-z

关键词

PRRT; Lu-177-octreotate; NET; Salvage therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the outcome and toxicity of salvage therapy (repeat treatment) with Lu-177-octreotate and high cumulative activities in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET). We retrospectively analysed a consecutive cohort of 33 patients with metastatic GEP-NET who underwent salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in our institution. All patients had progressive NET prior to salvage treatment and had shown an initial response to PRRT. The mean cumulative activity was 44.3 GBq (30.0-83.7 GBq). Radiographic response was assessed using CT and/or MRI according to modified SWOG criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using laboratory data, including complete blood counts and renal function tests using CTCAE 3.0. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier curve method and a significance level at p < 0.05. Radiographic responses consisted of complete response in 1 patient (3.0 %), partial response in 6 patients (18.2 %), minor response in 1 patient (3.0 %), stable disease in 14 patients (42.4 %), and progressive disease in 11 patients (33.3 %). Median progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of salvage therapy was 13 months (95 % CI 9-18) and patients with a history of a durable PFS after initial PRRT tended to have long-lasting PFS after salvage treatment (p = 0.04). None of the patients developed severe nephrotoxicity (grade 3/4) or a myelodysplastic syndrome during follow-up. Relevant albeit reversible haematotoxicity (grade 3/4) occurred in 7 patients (21.2 %). The cumulative administered activity was not associated with an increased incidence of haematotoxicity. PRRT with Lu-177-octreotate in the re-treatment setting is safe and effective in patients with metastatic GEP-NET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据