4.7 Article

PET imaging of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin expression in tumours with Ga-68-labelled mono-, di- and tetrameric RGD peptides

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1615-x

关键词

alpha(v)beta(3) integrin receptor; MicroPET; Multimers; Angiogenesis; Ga-68

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the restricted expression of alpha(v)beta(3) in tumours, alpha(v)beta(3) is considered a suitable receptor for tumour targeting. In this study the alpha(v)beta(3)-binding characteristics of Ga-68-labelled monomeric, dimeric and tetrameric RGD peptides were determined and compared with their In-111-labelled counterparts. A monomeric (E-c(RGDfK)), a dimeric (E-[c(RGDfK)](2)) and a tetrameric (E{E[c(RGDfK)](2)}(2)) RGD peptide were synthesised, conjugated with DOTA and radiolabelled with Ga-68. In vitro alpha(v)beta(3)-binding characteristics were determined in a competitive binding assay. In vivo alpha(v)beta(3)-targeting characteristics of the compounds were assessed in mice with subcutaneously growing SK-RC-52 xenografts. In addition, microPET images were acquired using a microPET/CT scanner. The IC50 values for the Ga(III)-labelled DOTA-E-c(RGDfK), DOTA-E-[c(RGDfK)](2) and DOTA-E{E[c(RGDfK)](2)}(2) were 23.9 +/- 1.22, 8.99 +/- 1.20 and 1.74 +/- 1.18 nM, respectively, and were similar to those of the In(III)-labelled mono-, di- and tetrameric RGD peptides (26.6 +/- 1.15, 3.34 +/- 1.16 and 1.80 +/- 1.37 nM, respectively). At 2 h post-injection, tumour uptake of the Ga-68-labelled mono-, di- and tetrameric RGD peptides (3.30 +/- 0.30, 5.24 +/- 0.27 and 7.11 +/- 0.67%ID/g, respectively) was comparable to that of their In-111-labelled counterparts (2.70 +/- 0.29, 5.61 +/- 0.85 and 7.32 +/- 2.45%ID/g, respectively). PET scans were in line with the biodistribution data. On all PET scans, the tumour could be clearly visualised. The integrin affinity and the tumour uptake followed the order of DOTA-tetramer > DOTA-dimer > DOTA-monomer. The Ga-68-labelled tetrameric RGD peptide has excellent characteristics for imaging of alpha(v)beta(3) expression with PET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据