4.7 Article

The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0874-2

关键词

Standardisation; FDG; PET; Multi-centre trials; QC; SUV; Quantification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Several studies have shown the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET) quantification using standardised uptake values (SUV) for diagnosis and staging, prognosis and response monitoring. Many factors affect SUV, such as patient preparation procedures, scan acquisition, image reconstruction and data analysis settings, and the variability in methodology across centres prohibits exchange of SUV data. Therefore, standardisation of 2-[F-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET whole body procedures is required in multi-centre trials. Methods A protocol for standardisation of quantitative FDG whole body PET studies in the Netherlands (NL) was defined. This protocol is based on standardisation of: (1) patient preparation; (2) matching of scan statistics by prescribing dosage as function of patient weight, scan time per bed position, percentage of bed overlap and image acquisition mode (2D or 3D); (3) matching of image resolution by prescribing reconstruction settings for each type of scanner; (4) matching of data analysis procedure by defining volume of interest methods and SUV calculations and; (5) finally, a multi-centre QC procedure is defined using a 20-cm diameter phantom for verification of scanner calibration and the NEMA NU 2 2001 Image Quality phantom for verification of activity concentration recoveries (i.e., verification of image resolution and reconstruction convergence). Discussion This paper describes a protocol for standardization of quantitative FDG whole body multi-centre PET studies. Conclusion The protocol was successfully implemented in the Netherlands and has been approved by the Netherlands Society of Nuclear Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据