4.5 Article

Long-term depression of synaptic transmission in the adult mouse insular cortex in vitro

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12330

关键词

glutamate receptor; insular cortex; long-term depression; multi-electrode array; protein phosphatase

资金

  1. MRC UK [G0800498]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology
  4. MRC [G0601813, MC_G1000734, G0800498] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0800498, G0601813, MC_G1000734, G0601841B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insular cortex (IC) is known to play important roles in higher brain functions such as memory and pain. Activity-dependent long-term depression (LTD) is a major form of synaptic plasticity related to memory and chronic pain. Previous studies of LTD have mainly focused on the hippocampus, and no study in the IC has been reported. In this study, using a 64-channel recording system, we show for the first time that repetitive low-frequency stimulation (LFS) can elicit frequency-dependent LTD of glutamate receptor-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission in both superficial and deep layers of the IC of adult mice. The induction of LTD in the IC required activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)5, and L-type voltage-gated calcium channel. Protein phosphatase 1/2A and endocannabinoid signaling are also critical for the induction of LTD. In contrast, inhibiting protein kinase C, protein kinase A, protein kinase M or calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II did not affect LFS-evoked LTD in the IC. Bath application of the group I mGluR agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine produced another form of LTD in the IC, which was NMDA receptor-independent and could not be occluded by LFS-induced LTD. Our studies have characterised the basic mechanisms of LTD in the IC at the network level, and suggest that two different forms of LTD may co-exist in the same population of IC synapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据