4.5 Review

Engrailed signaling in axon guidance and neuron survival

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 1837-1845

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08139.x

关键词

axon guidance; engrailed; homeoproteins; local translation; neuroprotection; Parkinson's disease; protein transduction

资金

  1. Fondation de France
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-06-013-01]
  3. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [222999]
  4. Global Research Laboratory Program grant from the Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2009-00424]
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  6. Foundation for Medical Research (FRM)
  7. NERF (Ile de France)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-00424] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several homeoproteins can function in a direct cell non-autonomous fashion to control various biological processes. In the developing nervous system, this mode of signaling has been well documented for Engrailed in the guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons and retino-tectal patterning. Engrailed is also a key factor for mesencephalic dopaminergic (mDA) neurons, not only during development but also in the adult. Haplodeficiency for Engrailed1 leads to progressive adult-onset loss of mDA neurons and several phenotypic alterations reminiscent of Parkinsons disease (PD). Thanks to its transduction properties, Engrailed has been shown to confer neuroprotection in several experimental models of PD. Study of the mechanisms underlying these two Engrailed-mediated effects has revealed a key role of the translation regulation by Engrailed and uncovered an unsuspected link between a homeoprotein and mitochondrial activity. These studies highlight the crucial role of cellular energetic metabolism in neuron development, survival and neurodegeneration, and may help to identify novel therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据