4.5 Article

Understanding inverse oxygenation responses during motor imagery: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 2318-2328

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07720.x

关键词

drawing task; functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); inter-subject variability; inverse/negative oxygenation response; motor imagery

资金

  1. International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motor imagery (MI) is described as the mental rehearsal of voluntary movements. We used wireless functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) recorded over secondary motor areas during performance of MI and motor execution (ME) in 11 healthy subjects, who either executed or imagined two drawing tasks differing in shape and frequency, i.e. simple (circle, 0.2 Hz) and complex (curved shape, 0.333 Hz). At the group level, results showed that fNIRS is capable of discriminating between the task mode, i.e. MI vs. ME, and the task complexity, i.e. simple vs. complex. At the single-subject level, we observed inverse oxygenation responses, i.e. a decrease in Delta[O(2)Hb] and/or increase in Delta[HHb]. These inverse responses only occurred during MI tasks and were highly correlated, in the first place, with task mode, and secondly with task complexity. Inverse Delta[O(2)Hb] responses are likely to reflect individual differences in performance-related signals and may contribute to the commonly observed inter-subject variability in fNIRS measurements. As MI is now widely used as a mental task in neurorehabilitative applications, the resulting oxygenation pattern may be of use for future developments. For this programme to be successful it is crucial to determine the sources of inter-subject variability. Our study presents a first effort in this direction, indicating that MI-related inverse Delta[O(2)Hb] responses are correlated, first, with task mode and, secondly, with task complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据