4.5 Article

Effects of Bax gene deletion on social behaviors and neural response to olfactory cues in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 1492-1499

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07881.x

关键词

cell death; c-Fos; olfactory preference; sex difference

资金

  1. CIHR [FRN 76508]
  2. NSERC
  3. NIH [RO1 MH068482, K02 MH072825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bax is a pro-death protein that plays a crucial role in developmental neuronal cell death. Bax-/- mice exhibit increased neuron number and lack several neural sex differences. Here we examined the effects of Bax gene deletion on social behaviors (olfactory preference, social recognition, social approach and aggression) and the neural processing of olfactory cues. Bax deletion eliminated the normal sex difference in olfactory preference behavior. In the social recognition test, both genotypes discriminated a novel conspecific, but wild-type males and Bax-/- animals of both sexes spent much more time than wild-type females investigating stimulus animals. Similarly, Bax-/- mice were more sociable than wild-type mice in a social approach test. Bax deletion had no effect on aggression in a resident/intruder paradigm where males, regardless of genotype, exhibited a shorter latency to attack. Thus, the prevention of neuronal cell death by Bax gene deletion results in greater sociability as well as the elimination of sex differences in some social behaviors. To examine olfactory processing of socially relevant cues, we counted c-Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-ir) cells in several nodes of the accessory olfactory pathway after exposure to male-soiled or control bedding. In both genotypes, exposure to male-soiled bedding increased Fos-ir cells in the posterodorsal medial amygdala, principal nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial preoptic nucleus (MPN), and the response in the MPN was greater in females than in males. However, a reduction in Fos-ir cells was seen in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of Bax-/- mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据