4.5 Article

Maintaining network activity in submerged hippocampal slices: importance of oxygen supply

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 319-327

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06577.x

关键词

GABAergic interneuron; gamma oscillation; hippocampus; in vitro; rodent; sharp wave-ripple oscillation

资金

  1. British Council
  2. Hungarian Medical Council [ETT 47/2003]
  3. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA T049517]
  4. The Wellcome Trust
  5. NATO Scientific Fellowship
  6. OXION Wellcome Trust
  7. Medical Research Council [G0700932] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0700932] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies in brain slices have provided a wealth of data on the basic features of neurons and synapses. In the intact brain, these properties may be strongly influenced by ongoing network activity. Although physiologically realistic patterns of network activity have been successfully induced in brain slices maintained in interface-type recording chambers, they have been harder to obtain in submerged-type chambers, which offer significant experimental advantages, including fast exchange of pharmacological agents, visually guided patch-clamp recordings, and imaging techniques. Here, we investigated conditions for the emergence of network oscillations in submerged slices prepared from the hippocampus of rats and mice. We found that the local oxygen level is critical for generation and propagation of both spontaneously occurring sharp wave-ripple oscillations and cholinergically induced fast oscillations. We suggest three ways to improve the oxygen supply to slices under submerged conditions: (i) optimizing chamber design for laminar flow of superfusion fluid; (ii) increasing the flow rate of superfusion fluid; and (iii) superfusing both surfaces of the slice. These improvements to the recording conditions enable detailed studies of neurons under more realistic conditions of network activity, which are essential for a better understanding of neuronal network operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据