4.5 Article

Fast oscillations in cortical-striatal networks switch frequency following rewarding events and stimulant drugs

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 848-859

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06843.x

关键词

amphetamine; interneurons; piriform; rats; rhythm; striatum

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  2. National Institute of Mental Health
  3. Tourette Syndrome Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oscillations may organize communication between components of large-scale brain networks. Although gamma-band oscillations have been repeatedly observed in cortical-basal ganglia circuits, their functional roles are not yet clear. Here I show that, in behaving rats, distinct frequencies of ventral striatal local field potential oscillations show coherence with different cortical inputs. The similar to 50 Hz gamma oscillations that normally predominate in awake ventral striatum are coherent with piriform cortex, whereas similar to 80-100 Hz high-gamma oscillations are coherent with frontal cortex. Within striatum, entrainment to gamma rhythms is selective to fast-spiking interneurons, with distinct fast-spiking interneuron populations entrained to different gamma frequencies. Administration of the psychomotor stimulant amphetamine or the dopamine agonist apomorphine causes a prolonged decrease in similar to 50 Hz power and increase in similar to 80-100 Hz power. The same frequency switch is observed for shorter epochs spontaneously in awake, undrugged animals and is consistently provoked for < 1 s following reward receipt. Individual striatal neurons can participate in these brief high-gamma bursts with, or without, substantial changes in firing rate. Switching between discrete oscillatory states may allow different modes of information processing during decision-making and reinforcement-based learning, and may also be an important systems-level process by which stimulant drugs affect cognition and behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据