4.5 Article

Long-term reorganization of respiratory pathways after partial cervical spinal cord injury

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 897-908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06072.x

关键词

crossed phrenic pathways; plasticity; rat; respiratory network; rewiring; spinal cord injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) interrupts bulbospinal respiratory pathways innervating phrenic motoneurons, and induces an inactivation of phrenic nerves (PN) and diaphragm. We have previously shown that the ipsilateral (ipsi) PN was inactivated following a lateral C2 SCI, but was spontaneously partially reactivated 7 days post-SCI. This phrenic reactivation depended on contralateral (contra) descending pathways, located laterally, that cross the spinal midline. We analysed here whether long-term post-lesional changes may occur in the respiratory network. We showed that ipsi PN reactivation was greater at 3 months compared with 7 days post-SCI, and that it was enhanced after acute contra phrenicotomy (Phx), which also induced a substantial reactivation of the ipsi diaphragm (not detected at 7 days post-SCI). At 3 months post-SCI (compared with 7 days post-SCI), ipsi PN activity was only moderately affected by ipsi Phx or by gallamine treatment, a nicotinic neuromuscular blocking agent, indicating that it was less dependent on ipsi sensory phrenic afferents. After an additional acute contra SCI (C1) performed laterally, ipsi PN activity was abolished in rats 7 days post-SCI, but persisted in rats 3 months post-SCI. This activity thus depended on new functional descending pathways located medially rather than laterally. These may not involve newly recruited neurons as retrograde labelling showed that ipsi phrenic motoneurons were innervated by a similar number of medullary respiratory neurons after a short and long post-lesional time. These results show that after a long post-lesional time, phrenic reactivation is reinforced by an anatomo-functional reorganization of spinal respiratory pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据