4.7 Article

A single-arm, open-label study of alemtuzumab in treatment-refractory patients with multiple sclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 307-311

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03507.x

关键词

alemtuzumab; beta-interferon resistance; clinical trials; multiple sclerosis; refractory

资金

  1. Genzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alemtuzumab (CD52-specific humanized monoclonal antibody) was found to be an effective therapy for treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Objective: Evaluate alemtuzumab's effects in patients with treatment-refractory relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Methods: Forty-five relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients who experienced 2 relapses during 2 years prior to the study entry whilst receiving interferon therapy were administered 24 mg IV alemtuzumab/day for 5 days at baseline and 3 days 12 months later. Patients received premedication with 1 g IV methylprednisolone on days 1-3 at both times. Results: After 2-year follow-up, the annualized relapse rate was reduced by 94% compared to pre-treatment levels, from 1.6 (2 years prior to treatment) to 0.17 for the 2 years following (P < 0.0001). Moreover, 86% of patients showed stable or improved scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, and only 1 experienced an increase in disability lasting 6 months. The majority (70-88%) showed stable or improved leg, arm and cognitive function as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite. Serious adverse events observed in single patients were transient neutropenia and pneumonia, pulmonary emboli and deep vein thrombosis. Five patients developed clinical thyroid disorders but no opportunistic infections or cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura were observed. Conclusions: Alemtuzumab effectively reduced relapse rates and improved clinical scores in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis not controlled by interferon therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据