4.7 Article

Social consequences of multiple sclerosis: clinical and demographic predictors - a historical prospective cohort study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 1346-1351

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03020.x

关键词

cohort study; demographic predictors; disability pension; early retirement; multiple sclerosis; occupational status

资金

  1. Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society
  2. Merck Serono, Biogen, Heinrich Kopp's Foundation
  3. Local County Medical Research Foundation
  4. Regional Medical Association Research Foundation
  5. Aarhus University Hospital Research Initiative
  6. Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Time to disability pension is one of the endpoints to be used to determine the prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) in prospective studies. Objective: To assess the time to cessation of work and receiving disability pension in MS, and how it may depend on gender, type of work and age and symptom at onset. Method: A total of 2240 Danes with onset of definite/probable MS 1980-1989, identified from the Danish MS-Registry, were included. Information on social endpoints was retrieved from Statistics Denmark. Cox regression analyses were used with onset as starting point. Results: Afferent onset symptoms [hazard ratio (HR 0.57)] and non-physical type of work (HR 0.70) were favourable prognostic factors compared with high age at onset, physical work and efferent symptoms at onset. The mean time to disability pension was 13 years for patients with afferent/brainstem onset symptom but 8.7 years for those with efferent onset symptoms (P < 0.0001). The effect of onset symptom was reduced and the effect of sex became significant when all covariates and age at onset were included in multivariate Cox regression. Conclusions: Onset age, type of onset symptom and work are robust predictors of disability pension in MS. Disability pension proves to be a reliable milestone in estimation of the prognosis of MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据