4.2 Article

Synthesis and structural study of five new trisilicates, BaREE2Si3O10 (REE = Gd, Er, Yb, Sc) and SrY2Si3O10, including a review on the geometry of the Si3O10 unit

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 245-258

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2010/0022-1969

关键词

crystal structure; trisilicates; mixed octahedral-tetrahedral framework; flux-growth method; single-crystal X-ray diffraction; rare-earth elements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five new mixed-framework trisilicates were synthesised using a high-temperature flux growth technique. Colourless, glassy plates of SrY2Si3O10 crystallise in space group P (1) over tilde, with a = 6.757(1), b = 6.885(1), c = 9.273(2) angstrom, alpha = 72.42(3), beta = 86.37(3), gamma = 88.37(3)degrees, V = 410.38(12)angstrom(3), Z = 2. The main building units of the new structure type represented by SrY2Si3O10 are slightly curved Si3O10 trimers and Y2O11 dimers (composed of YO6 octahedra sharing an edge with YO7 polyhedra), which are further edge-connected to adjacent dimers to form twisted zigzag chains parallel to [010]. BaREE2Si3O10 (REE Gd, Er, Yb, Sc) form colourless small prisms, pseudohexagonal plates or isometric crystals, and crystallise in space group P2(1)/m, with respectively a = 5.435(1) /5.389(1) /5.377(1) /5.273(1), b = 12.241(2) /12.163(2) /12.117(2) /11.918(2), c = 6.932(1) /6.840(1) /6.790(1) / 6.591(1) angstrom, beta = 106.26(3) /106.47(3) /106.50(3) /107.06(3)degrees, V = 442.74(13) /429.94(12) /424.17(12) /395.98(12) angstrom(3), Z = 2. BaREE2Si3O10 (REE Gd, Er, Yb, Sc) are isotypic with BaY2Si3O10. Their topology is characterised by horseshoe-shaped trisilicate (Si3O10) groups and zigzag chains of edge-sharing distorted MO6 octahedra (M Gd, Er, Yb, Sc). Correlations between b-, Si-Si-Si angle and unit-cell volume and REE3+ ionic radii are discussed. The geometries of the Si3O10 and T3O10 groups (T Ge, P, As, Al, Ga, V) in non-silicates are briefly reviewed, with special focus on narrow Si-Si-Si angles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据