4.7 Article

1,2,3-Triazole-containing derivatives of rupestonic acid: Click-chemical synthesis and antiviral activities against influenza viruses

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 245-255

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.02.029

关键词

Rupestonic acid; 1,2,3-Triazole; Click chemistry; Influenza virus

资金

  1. Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31110103908]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB723502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two series of rupestonic acid derivatives, (1-substituted-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl 2-((5R,8S,8aS)-3,8-dimethyl-2-oxo-1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydroazulen-5-yl)acrylate and N-(1-substituted-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl 2-((5R,8S,8aS)-3,8-dimethyl-2-oxo-1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydroazulen-5-yl)acrylamide were easily and efficiently synthesized via click chemistry. These compounds were tested for their in vitro activities against various strains of influenza A virus (H1N1, oseltamivir resistant H1N1, H3N2) and influenza B virus. The results showed that nine compounds were active against the H1N1 strain of influenza A virus and among them the best one 14a, was as active as the reference drugs, Oseltamivir and Ribavirin. Some of them were also active on the Oseltamivir resistant H1N1 strain. In regards to influenza B virus, twenty-one compounds over thirty were active and seven of them 7b, 8b, 9b, 10a, 11b, 12b, 13b showed better activity than Ribavirin. The structure-activity relationship of these compounds is discussed on the basis of each type of the viruses studied. Furthermore, four best representative compounds 7b, 10a, 12b and 14a were evaluated in a plaque assay experiment using MDCK cells and RBV as control compound and the results showed that 7b, 10a and 12b were better than RBV in inhibiting plaque formation, in good accordance with their anti-influenza B activities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据