4.7 Article

Novel nitro(triazole/imidazole)-based heteroarylamides/sulfonamides as potential antitrypanosomal agents

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 79-88

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.09.045

关键词

Nitrotriazoles; Nitroimidazoles; Heteroarylamides; Heteroarylsulfonamides; Chagas disease; Antitrypanosomal agents

资金

  1. Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi)
  2. Radiation Medicine Department of NorthShore University HealthSystem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that 3-nitro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-based arylamides and arylsulfonamides demonstrate significant activity in vitro against Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative parasite of Chagas disease. More importantly, several such analogs displayed significant antichagasic activity in vivo, superior to that of benznidazole, the current clinical standard. We now report the synthesis and in vitro evaluation of a small series of novel nitro(triazole/imidazole)-based heteroarylamides/sulfonamides (including 3-nitrotriazole-, 2- and 4-nitroimidazole-based compounds) as potential antitrypanosomal agents. All nitrotriazoles displayed significant growth inhibitory properties against T. cruzi with the most potent generating IC50 values of <1 mu M and up to >1400-fold selectivity toward the parasite. The 2-nitroimidazole-based derivatives were moderately active against T. cruzi and displayed selectivity <50, while the 4-nitroimidazoles were mostly inactive. Several 3-nitrotriazole-based analogs showed activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense but none of the tested compounds displayed activity toward Leishmania donovani. From the detailed SARs presented here, we identified the 3-nitrotriazole-based chlorinated thiophene/benzothiophene sulfonamides/amides as being the most active antichagasic compounds, displaying up to 14-fold higher potency against T. cruzi than the reference compound benznidazole. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据