4.7 Article

Activity of novel quinoxaline-derived chalcones on in vitro glioma cell proliferation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 255-264

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.12.023

关键词

Synthesis; Quinoxaline; Chalcones; Anti-cancer activity; Anti-proliferative; Glioma cells

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brasil
  3. Institution (PROBOLSAS Program/PUCRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gliomas are the most common and devastating tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Many pieces of evidence point out the relevance of natural compounds for cancer therapy and prevention, including chalcones. In the present study, eight synthetic quinoxaline-derived chalcones, structurally based on the selective PI3K gamma inhibitor AS605240, were evaluated for anti-proliferative activity and viability inhibition using glioma cell lines from human and rat origin (U-138 MG and C6, respectively), at different time-periods of incubation and concentrations. The results revealed that four chalcones (compounds 1, 6, 7 and 8), which present methoxy groups at A-ring, displayed higher efficacies and potencies, being able to inhibit either cell proliferation or viability, in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, with an efficacy that was greater than that seen for the positive control compound AS605240. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that incubation of C6 cells with compound 6 led to Cl phase arrest, likely indicating an interference with apoptosis. Furthermore, compound 6 was able to visibly inhibit ART activation, allied to the stimulation of ERR MAP-kinase. The chalcones tested herein, especially those displaying a methoxy substituent, might well represent promising molecules for the adjuvant treatment of glioma progression. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据