4.7 Article

Synthetic, structural and biochemical studies of polynuclear platinum(II) complexes with heterocyclic ligands

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 1041-1048

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.06.023

关键词

Polydentate nitrogen ligands; Polynuclear platinum complexes; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione
  2. della Universie e della Ricerca, Rome
  3. Universita degli Studi di Palermo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-classical di- and trinuclear Pt(II) complexes with polydentate nitrogen ligands; ionic [(PtCl2)(2)(tPtz)(2)(mu-PtClNCPh)]Cl (1) [tptz = 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine], [(PtCl2)(2)(bplz)(2)(mu-Pt)]Cl-2 (2) [bptz 3,6-bis(2-pyzidyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine] and neutral [(PtCl2)(2)(tPtz)(2)( t-PtCl2)](H2O)(4) (3), [(PtCl2)(2)(mu-tppz)](CHCl3) (4) [tppz = 2,3,5,6-tetra(2-pyridyl)pyrazine] complexes, have been prepared and structurally characterized. The neutral tptz and tppz complexes present three and two separate PtCl2, moieties, respectively, in a cis position, presumably acting in a bifunctional mode towards DNA; the cationic tptz and bptz. complexes contain monofunctional and bifunctional bridging Pt(II) moieties, respectively, (other Pt(II) moieties in the complexes are bifunctional). All complexes were tested for their biological activity. Both tptz complexes, neutral and ionic, show a potent cytotoxic activity and reduced cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner that was evaluated in a panel of different cancer cell lines: human HT29 colon-rectal carcinoma, HepG2 hepatoma, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and MG63 osteosarcoma cells, their activity was higher than cisplatin, IC50 values have been calculated for the active compounds and flow cytometric analysis for the tptz complexes performed, Therefore, these new platinum drugs warrant further investigation into their antitumor activity against different types of tumors. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据