4.1 Article

Detailed clinical, genetic and neuroimaging characterization of OFD VI syndrome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 301-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.03.004

关键词

Oral-facial-digital syndrome; OFD VI syndrome; Cerebellar malformation; Molar tooth sign; Joubert syndrome and related disorders; OFD1

资金

  1. General Counsil of Burgundy
  2. French GIS-Maladies
  3. French Ministry of Health PHRC (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) [2010-A01014-35]
  4. ANR (FOETOCILPATH) [BLAN 1122 01]
  5. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral-facial-digital syndrome type VI (OFD VI) is characterized by the association of malformations of the face, oral cavity and extremities, distinguished from the 12 other OFD syndromes by cerebellar and metacarpal abnormalities. Cerebellar malformations in OFD VI have been described as a molar tooth sign (MTS), thus, including OFD VI among the Joubert syndrome related disorders (JSRD). OFD VI diagnostic criteria have recently been suggested: MTS and one or more of the following: 1) tongue hamartoma(s) and/or additional frenula and/or upper lip notch; 2) mesoaxial polydactyly of hands or feet; 3) hypothalamic hamartoma. In order to further delineate this rare entity, we present the neurological and radiological data of 6 additional OFD VI patients. All patients presented oral malformations, facial dysmorphism and distal abnormalities including frequent polydactyly (66%), as well as neurological symptoms with moderate to severe mental retardation. Contrary to historically reported patients, mesoaxial polydactyly did not appear to be a predominant clinical feature in OFD VI. Sequencing analyzes of the 14 genes implicated in JSRD up to 2011 revealed only an OFD1 frameshift mutation in one female OFD VI patient, strengthening the link between these two oral-facial-digital syndromes and JSRD. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据