4.1 Article

A mass spectrometric approach for the study of the metabolism of clomiphene, tamoxifen and toremifene by liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectroscopy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 171-180

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1255/ejms.921

关键词

selective estrogen receptor modulators; LC-MS-ToF; anti-doping analysis

资金

  1. Italian Department of Health Ministero cells Salute, Commissione per la vigilanza sul doping e sulla tuteta sanitaria delle attivita sportive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we discuss the capabilities of liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with a time-of-flight system with accurate mass measurement for the detection and characterisation of drug metabolites in biological samples for anti-doping purpose. Urinary excretion samples of three selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with a common triphenylethylene structure: clomiphene, toremifene and tamoxifen, obtained after oral administration of a single dose of each drug, were analysed using a time-of-flight system, after automatic tuning and calibration of the equipment, in positive full scan mode using an electrospray ionisation source. Following this approach we detected most of all significant metabolites reported by others and postulated new metabolites, especially for toremifene, have been characterised: N-demethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxy-toremifene and 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy-toremifene; in addtion to this, in the urinary excretion samples of toremifene some metabolites, without the characteristic chlorine isotope pattern, discarded in previous studies, that are also metabolites of tamoxifen, were identified. The tack of certified reference materials does not allow an accurate determination of the limit of detection (LODs) of all metabolites; however, an estimation taking into account the response factor of similar compounds allows to estimate that all metabolites are clearly detectable in a range of concentration comprised between 10 ng mL(-1) and 30 ng mL(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据