4.6 Article

Pleural fluid C-reactive protein contributes to the diagnosis and assessment of severity of parapneumonic effusions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 447-450

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.03.002

关键词

Parapneumonic effusion; Empyema; C-reactive protein; Pleural fluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Prompt identification of parapneumonic effusions has immediate therapeutic benefits. We aimed to assess whether C-reactive protein (CRP) and routine biochemistries in pleural fluid are accurate markers of parapneumonic effusions, and to evaluate their properties as indicators for drainage (complicated parapneumonic effusion). Methods: A retrospective review of 340 non-purulent parapneumonic effusions and 1,659 non-parapneumonic exudates from a single center was performed and the discriminative properties of pleural fluid routine biochemistries and, when available, CRP were evaluated. CRP, along with classical fluid parameters, was also applied to classify patients as having complicated or uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions. ROC analysis established the threshold of CRP for discriminating between groups. Results: Pleural fluids with neutrophilic predominance and CRP levels >45 mg/dL were most likely to be parapneumonic in origin (likelihood ratio=7.7). When attempting to differentiate non-purulent complicated from uncomplicated effusions, a CRP > 100 mg/L had the same performance characteristics (area under the curve=0.81) as the widely accepted biochemistries pH and glucose. Combinations of CRP with pH or glucose resulted in incrementally discriminating values, pertaining to either sensitivity (75-80%) or specificity (97%), for complicated effusions. Conclusion: Pleural fluid CRP may be a useful adjunctive test in pleural effusions, both as a marker of parapneumonics and, particularly, as a differentiator between complicated and uncomplicated effusions. (C) 2012 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据