4.6 Article

The utility of routine admission chest X-ray films on patient care

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 286-288

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.12.007

关键词

Routine chest x-ray; Emergency department; Health care costs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Routine chest X-rays are the most widely obtained radiological studies during hospital admissions. In this study, we evaluated the utility of routine admission chest X-rays on patient care in patients admitted to The Brooklyn Hospital center. Methods: We included consecutive patients admitted to the medical floors during a 4-month period who had a chest X-ray done on admission. The medical records of patients who had chest X-ray on admission were reviewed to identify any impact of chest X-ray on patient care during the course of hospitalization. Results: Chest X-ray was noted to be done in 229 patients on admission. Chest X-rays of 100 (43.6%) patients were deemed medically necessary because of the presenting complaints which included cough (15.2%), fever (13.1%), dyspnea (6.1%), hemoptysis (1.7%), and combined symptoms (7.4%). Routine chest X-rays were done in 129 (56.3%) patients to rule out occult findings in the absence of any symptoms. Chest X-ray abnormalities were noted in 56 of 129 (43.4%) patients. In 51 of 56 patients, abnormalities were chronic, stable and previously known and did not contribute to patient care. In only 5 of 129 (3.87%) patients, there were findings which necessitated a change in patient care. Conclusion: We conclude that routine chest films rarely reveal clinically unsuspected findings. The overall impact on patient care based on these findings is small when compared to the risks associated with repeated exposure to radiation. We recommend that routine chest X-ray films should not be ordered solely because of hospital admission. (C) 2010 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据