4.5 Review

Toward the tools selection in model based system engineering for embedded systems-A systematic literature review

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 150-163

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.089

关键词

MBSE; Embedded systems; Tools

资金

  1. NSTIP (National Science Technology, Innovative Plan), Saudi Arabia under the Technology Area Information Technology Strategic Priorities
  2. NSTIP (National Science Technology, Innovative Plan), Saudi Arabia under the Track Software Engineering and Innovated Systems
  3. KACST (King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology)
  4. STU (Science and Technology Unit) Makkah [13-INF761-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Model based system engineering (MBSE) is a systematic approach of modeling which is frequently used to support requirement specification, design, verification and validation activities of system development. However, it is difficult to customize MBSE approach for the development of embedded systems due to their diverse behavioral aspects. Furthermore, appropriate tools selection to perform particular MBSE activities is always challenging. This paper focuses on the identification and classification of recent research practices pertaining to embedded systems development through MBSE approach. Consequently, a comprehensive analysis of various MBSE tools has been presented. Systematic literature review (SLR) has been used to identify 61 research practices published during 2008-2014. The identified researches have been classified into six different categories to analyze various aspects of MBSE approach for embedded systems. Consequently, 39 preliminary tools are identified that have been used in recent researches. Furthermore, classification and evaluation of tools have been presented. This research highlights important trends and approaches of MBSE to support development of embedded systems. A comprehensive investigation of tools in this article facilitates researchers, practitioners and developers to select appropriate tools according to their requirements. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据