4.5 Review

Photocatalytic H2 and Added-Value By-Products - The Role of Metal Oxide Systems in Their Synthesis from Oxygenates

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 28, 页码 4309-4323

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201100532

关键词

Hydrogen; Photoreforming; Metal oxides; Semiconductors; Biomass

资金

  1. Padova University [PRAT2008/2010]
  2. Trieste University
  3. Istituto di Chimica dei Composti OrganoMetallici - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ICCOM-CNR)
  4. MIUR [COFIN-PRIN2008]
  5. Regione Lombardia-INSTM
  6. Fondazione CRTrieste
  7. Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing demand for hydrogen for industrial use and as a fuel pushes for innovative and sustainable production strategies, which can be applied both in centralized, large-scale plants and in delocalized small units. At present, hydrogen is mainly produced by steam reforming of natural gas or oil. Nevertheless, the shortage of fossil fuel reserves and the increasing concern regarding environmental pollution have stimulated the search for alternative production routes, among which photocatalysis over metal oxide semiconductors represents a strategically attractive solution. Whereas the direct splitting of water is still a challenging issue because of intrinsic process drawbacks, a valuable alternative for a sustainable photocatalytic H-2 production is the use of biomass-derived compounds as raw materials. Upon photoactivation in the presence of an appropriate semiconductor, such feedstocks can undergo oxidation to CO2 with simultaneous H-2 production in the so-called photoreforming process. When the oxidation is selective rather than complete, the process might be of further interest due to the added value of the obtained carbon-containing by-products. This microreview focuses on recent developments in this field, with particular attention to the use of representative biomass-derived oxygenated compounds, such as methanol, ethanol, glycerol, and sugars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据