4.5 Review

Cytotoxic Titanium(IV) Complexes: Renaissance

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 15, 页码 2203-2218

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200900198

关键词

Titanium(IV); Phenolato ligands; Coordination modes; Hydrolysis; Cytotoxicity; Titanocene dichloride; Budotitane; Cisplatin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we over-view our studies on amine-phenolato Ti-IV complexes as cytotoxic agents, in the context of the results reported thus far with titanocene dichloride, budotitane and derivatives. In particular, we emphasize the studies about the structure-activity relationship performed and important insights gained with the known compounds and our complexes, in regards to their hydrolytic behavior and cytotoxic activity, while pointing to potential mechanistic aspects. Titanocene dichloride and budotitane show cytotoxic activity towards cells that are resistant to cisplatin with reduced side effects. Their main drawback is their hydrolytic instability that has impeded mechanistic investigations and pharmaceutical use. Our new family of cytotoxic complexes was designed to include a single highly electron-donating chelating ligand to afford octahedral Ti-IV complexes of relatively high hydrolytic stability, with the aim to retain ligand binding throughout the biological activity for achieving controlled processes and allowing mechanistic evaluation. The effect of several parameters on hydrolysis and cytotoxicity were investigated, including those relating to the tetradentate ligand and those relating to the labile groups, Overall we observed high cytotoxic activity that is strongly dependent on the ligand, and which is strongly correlated to the complex hydrolytic behavior. Additional mechanistic studies provide insights regarding the time frame of activity and cell penetration. Some comparisons to titanocene dichloride, budotitane and analogues are highlighted. ((C) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据