4.5 Article

2-Thiopheneacetato-Based One-Dimensional Coordination Polymer of Tb3+: Enhancement of Terbium-Centered Luminescence in the Presence of Bidentate Nitrogen Donor Ligands

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 28, 页码 4387-4394

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200800506

关键词

Enhanced terbium luminescence; 2-Thiopheneacetic acid; Bidentate nitrogen donors; 1D Coordination polymer

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [NWP0010]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [F-0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new lanthanide(III) complexes of 2-thiopheneacetic acid (HTPAC), [Tb(TPAC)(3)center dot H2O](n) (1), [Gd(TPAC)(3)center dot H2O](n) (2), [Tb(TPAC)(3)(phen)](2) (3) and [Tb(TPAC)(3)(bath)](2) (4) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; bath = bathophenanthroline) have been synthesized and characterized by various spectroscopic techniques. The X-ray structure of 1 reveals that each Tb3+ ion is connected to two neighboring ions by six thiopheneacetic acid ligands via the carboxylate groups to form an infinite one-dimensional polymer. The unit cell contains only one independent crystallographic site for the Tb ions. The carboxylate groups of the six molecules of the thiopheneacetate ligands are coordinated in both bidentate bridging and tridentate chelate-bridging modes. Each Tb3+ ion is coordinated by nine oxygen atoms in an overall distorted tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry. Eight of the oxygen atoms are furnished by the carboxylate moieties, and the remaining oxygen atom is provided by the water molecule. The photophysical properties of these complexes in the solid state at room temperature have been investigated. The quantum yields of 3 (4.43 +/- 0.44 %) and 4 (9.06 +/- 0.90 %) were found to be significantly enhanced by the presence of the bidentate nitrogen donor ligands in comparison with that of 1 (0.07 +/- 0.01 %) due to effective energy transfer from the secondary ligands. ((c) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2008)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据