4.5 Article

Non-neutralizing antibodies protect from chronic LCMV infection independently of activating FcγR or complement

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 2349-2360

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201343566

关键词

Binding antibodies; Chronic viral infection; Fc receptors; Interleukin 10 (IL-10); LCMV

资金

  1. ETH Zurich
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030-129751]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_129751] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic viral infections lead to CD8(+) T cell exhaustion, characterized by impaired cytokine secretion. The presence of the immune-regulatory cytokine IL-10 promotes chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) Clone 13 infection in mice, whereas the absence of IL-10/IL-10R signaling early during infection results in viral clearance and higher percentages and numbers of antiviral, cytokine-producing T cells. However, it is currently unclear which cell populations and effector molecules are crucial to protect against chronic infection. In this study, we demonstrate that antiviral, LCMV-binding, non-neutralizing antibodies are needed, in addition to CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, to clear a high-dose LCMV infection in mice, in the absence of IL-10. The interaction between CD4(+) T cells and B cells in B-cell follicles via CD40/CD40L, in addition to class switch and/or somatic hypermutation, is crucial for viral control in the absence of IL-10. Interestingly, transfer of LCMV-binding non-neutralizing antibodies protected recipients from chronic infection. In addition, viral clearance in the absence of IL-10R signaling was independent of activating Fc receptors and complement. These data highlight that non-neutralizing antibodies effectively contribute to the control of LCMV infection when present prior to infection, suggesting that the induction of neutralizing antibodies is not implicitly necessary for the generation of successful vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据