4.5 Article

Lack of adiponectin leads to increased lymphocyte activation and increased disease severity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 2089-2100

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201242836

关键词

Adiponectin; EAE; Immunomodulation; Multiple sclerosis

资金

  1. Consortium of MS Centers
  2. National MS Society (NMSS) [PP1645]
  3. McDonnell Center for Cellular & Molecular Neurobiology, Nutrition and Obesity Research Center (NORC) [P30 DK056341]
  4. Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM) [2009/R/33]
  5. Barnes-Jewish Foundation
  6. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK080344]
  7. Manny and Rosalyn Rosenthal-Dr. John L. Trotter Chair

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a presumed autoimmune disease directed against central nervous system (CNS) myelin, in which diet and obesity are implicated as risk factors. Immune responses can be influenced by molecules produced by fat cells, called adipokines. Adiponectin is an adipokine with anti-inflammatory effects. We tested the hypothesis that adiponectin has a protective role in the EAE model for MS, that can be induced by immunization with myelin antigens or transfer of myelin-specific T lymphocytes. Adiponectin deficient (ADPKO) mice developed worse EAE with greater CNS inflammation, demyelination, and axon injury. Lymphocytes from myelin-immunized ADPKO mice proliferated more, produced higher amounts of IFN-, IL-17, TNF-, IL-6, and transferred more severe EAE than wild type (WT) lymphocytes. At EAE peak, the spleen and CNS of ADPKO had fewer regulatory T (Treg) cells than WT mice and during EAE recovery, Foxp3, IL-10 and TGF- expression levels in the CNS were reduced in ADPKO compared with WT mice. Treatment with globular adiponectin in vivo ameliorated EAE, and was associated with an increase in Treg cells. These data indicate that adiponectin is an important regulator of T-cell functions during EAE, suggesting a new avenue of investigation for MS treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据