4.5 Article

Phenotypic and functional characteristics of CD4+CD39+FOXP3+ and CD4+CD39+FOXP3neg T-cell subsets in cancer patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 1876-1885

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201142347

关键词

ATP hydrolysis; CD4+CD39+Treg cells; CD39 expression; Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC); Immune suppression

资金

  1. NIH [PO1 CA109688]
  2. Pittsburgh-Essen-Partnership Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human CD4+CD39+ regulatory T (Treg) cells hydrolyze exogenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and participate in immunosuppressive adenosine production. They contain two T-cell subsets whose role in mediating suppression is not understood. Frequencies of both CD4+CD39+ subsets were evaluated in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 57 cancer patients and in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) of 6 patients. CD4+CD39+ and CD4+CD39neg T cells isolated using immunobeads and cell sorting were cultured under various conditions. Their conversion into CD39+FOXP3+CD25+ or CD39+FOXnegCD25neg cells was monitored by multiparameter flow cytometry. Hydrolysis of exogenous ATP was measured in luminescence assays. Two CD4+CD39+ cell subsets differing in expression of CD25, FOXP3, CTLA-4, CD121a, PD-1, latency associated peptide (LAP), glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP), and the cytokine profile accumulated with equal frequencies in the blood and tumor tissues of cancer patients. The frequency of both subsets was significantly increased in cancer. CD39 expression levels correlated with the subsets ability to hydrolyze ATP. Conventional CD4+CD39neg T cells incubated with IL-2 + TGF-beta expanded to generate CD4+CD39+FOXP3+ Treg cells, while CD4+CD39+FOXP3negCD25neg subset cells stimulated via the TCR and IL-2 converted to FOXP3+CTLA4+CD25+ TGF-beta-expressing Treg cells. Among CD4+CD39+ Treg cells, the CD4+CD39+FOXP3negCD25neg subset serves as a reservoir of cells able to convert to Treg cells upon activation by environmental signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据