4.5 Review

Experimental and natural infections in MyD88-and IRAK-4-deficient mice and humans

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 3126-3135

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201242683

关键词

Invasive pyogenic infections; IRAK4; MyD88; Primary immunodeficiency; Toll-like receptors

资金

  1. Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science [5UL1RR024143-03]
  2. Rockefeller University
  3. March of Dimes
  4. Dana Foundation
  5. ANR
  6. INSERM
  7. PHRC
  8. University San Raffaele (Milan, Italy)
  9. Legs Poix (Paris, France)
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG VO 995/1-1, VO 995/1-2]
  11. Medical Faculty, Charite, Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most Toll-like-receptors (TLRs) and interleukin-1 receptors (IL-1Rs) signal via myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4). The combined roles of these two receptor families in the course of experimental infections have been assessed in MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient mice for almost fifteen years. These animals have been shown to be susceptible to 46 pathogens: 27 bacteria, eight viruses, seven parasites, and four fungi. Humans with inborn MyD88 or IRAK-4 deficiency were first identified in 2003. They suffer from naturally occurring life-threatening infections caused by a small number of bacterial species, although the incidence and severity of these infections decrease with age. Mouse TLR- and IL-1R-dependent immunity mediated by MyD88 and IRAK-4 seems to be vital to combat a wide array of experimentally administered pathogens at most ages. By contrast, human TLR- and IL-1R-dependent immunity mediated by MyD88 and IRAK-4 seems to be effective in the natural setting against only a few bacteria and is most important in infancy and early childhood. The roles of TLRs and IL-1Rs in protective immunity deduced from studies in mutant mice subjected to experimental infections should therefore be reconsidered in the light of findings for natural infections in humans carrying mutations as discussed in this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据