4.5 Review

A global imaging view on systems approaches in immunology

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 3116-3125

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201242508

关键词

Imaging; Infection; Optical projection tomography; Selective plane illumination microscopy; Systems biology

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [Sinergia 125447]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-01-00117a]
  3. Russian Academy of Sciences (Basic Research for Medicine)
  4. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immune system exhibits an enormous complexity. High throughput methods such as the -omic technologies generate vast amounts of data that facilitate dissection of immunological processes at ever finer resolution. Using high-resolution data-driven systems analysis, causal relationships between complex molecular processes and particular immunological phenotypes can be constructed. However, processes in tissues, organs, and the organism itself (so-called higher level processes) also control and regulate the molecular (lower level) processes. Reverse systems engineering approaches, which focus on the examination of the structure, dynamics and control of the immune system, can help to understand the construction principles of the immune system. Such integrative mechanistic models can properly describe, explain, and predict the behavior of the immune system in health and disease by combining both higher and lower level processes. Moving from molecular and cellular levels to a multiscale systems understanding requires the development of methodologies that integrate data from different biological levels into multiscale mechanistic models. In particular, 3D imaging techniques and 4D modeling of the spatiotemporal dynamics of immune processes within lymphoid tissues are central for such integrative approaches. Both dynamic and global organ imaging technologies will be instrumental in facilitating comprehensive multiscale systems immunology analyses as discussed in this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据