4.5 Article

PKCδ regulates IL-12p40/p70 production by macrophages and dendritic cells, driving a type 1 healer phenotype in cutaneous leishmaniasis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 706-715

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201040985

关键词

Cytokines; DC; Kinases; Leishmania; Macrophages

资金

  1. Swiss Foundation
  2. Claude Leon Foundation South Africa
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa
  4. Medical Research Council (MRC) South Africa
  5. South African Research Chair Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology (DST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protein kinase C (PKC) family is involved in the regulation of many intracellular signalling pathways. Here, we report that the PKC delta isoform regulates IL-12p40/p70 production in macrophages and DC and that PKC delta deficiency in mice transforms the 129/Sv healer to a non-healer strain during cutaneous leishmaniasis. Leishmania major-infected PKC delta(-/-) 129/Sv mice developed a rapid increase in footpad swelling and parasite burden with disease progression, leading to necrosis and ulceration similar to non-healer BALB/c mice. Moreover, PKC delta (/) mice failed to develop delayed-type hypersensitivity responses against Leishmania antigen. PKC delta(-/-) macrophages were fully functional with normal MHC class II surface expression and GM-CSF production, recruitment to the draining lymph node and killing effector functions by NO production. In contrast, macrophages and DC produced significantly reduced IL-12p40 and IL-12p70 compared to the WT cells. Decreased IL-12 production resulted in diminished Th1 differentiation, as determined by a striking reduction in IFN-gamma by antigen-specific stimulated CD4(+) T cells isolated from popliteal lymph nodes of L. major-infected PKC delta(-/-) mice, explaining the non-healer'' phenotype. We conclude from these data that PKC delta is a regulator of IL-12p40/p70 production by DC and macrophages, driving the healer phenotype during cutaneous leishmaniasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据