4.5 Article

Activating NK-cell receptors co-stimulate CD4+CD28- T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 378-387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200939399

关键词

Cell activation; Cell surface molecules; Co-stimulation; Rheumatoid arthritis; T cells

资金

  1. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  2. Tobias Foundation
  3. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  4. Swedish Children Cancer Foundation
  5. Swedish Rheumatism association
  6. King Gustav V 80-year foundation
  7. Karolinska Institutet foundation
  8. Swedish Research Council
  9. Bernard Osher Initiative for Research on Severe Asthma at the Karolinska Institutet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effector T-cell responses can be modulated by competing positive or negative signals transduced by NK-cell receptors (NKR). In the CD4(+) T-cell population, the expression of NKR is primarily found in the CD4(+)CD28(-) T-cell subset, also known as CD28(null) T cells. These T cells are frequently found in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory disorders, suggesting that signaling through NKR may play a role in the autoimmune reaction. Here we aimed to dissect the phenotype and function of NKR-expressing CD4(+) CD28(-) T cells in patients with RA. By analyzing a broad array of NKR on CD4(+)CD28(-) T cells we found a significant expression of the co-activating receptors 2B4 (CD244), DNAM-1 (CD226), and CRACC. Pair-wise ligations of 2B4 with DNAM-1 and/or NKG2D lead to increased effector functions of primary CD4(+)CD28(-) T cells to suboptimal levels of anti-CD3 stimulation. Using multi-parameter flow cytometry, we demonstrate that such coligation led to an increased magnitude in overall responsiveness without changing qualitative aspects of the response. Altogether these results demonstrate a pattern of additive effects in NKR-mediated functional modulation of CD4(+)CD28(-) T cells in RA. This may have consequences for the inflammatory responses imposed by these cells, thus influencing disease manifestations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据