4.5 Article

CD56bright NK cells after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are activated mature NK cells that expand in patients with low numbers of T cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 3246-3254

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200940016

关键词

HSC transplantation; Human; Natural killer cells

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030-112612, 310030-127516, 31003A-124941]
  2. Dr. Henri Dubois-Ferriere-Dinu Lipatti'' Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_124941, 310030_127516] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied early NK-cell recovery in 29 allografted patients undergoing different lymphoreductive regimens. Already at 2 wk after graft take, the number of NK cells had reached (supra) normal levels but NK-cell subsets were skewed. The number of CD56(dim)CD16(bright) NK cells was low and correlated strongly with the level of hematopoiesis, whereas the number of the more abundant NK cells expressing high levels of CD56 did not. Post-transplant CD56(bright) NK cells (ptCD56(bright)) differed from CD56(bright) NK cells in normal controls (CD56(bright)) in being HLA-DR- and perforin-positive, CCR7, CD27, CD127(-) and mostly c-kit(-). CD56(bright) from normal controls stimulated by IL-15 in vitro (NKIL-15) acquired all the characteristics distinguishing CD56(bright) from ptCD56(bright). IL-2 exerted similar effects. Moreover, when cultured without cytokines, ptCD56(bright), CD56(bright) and NKIL-15 responded similarly by upregulating CD127 and c-kit but not CCR7. IL-12 stimulated IFN-gamma production in ptCD56(bright), whereas CD56(bright) responded only to IL-12 plus IL-15. Hence, ptCD56(bright) have all the features of cytokine-stimulated CD56(bright). Because only patients with low numbers of T cells had high numbers of ptCD56(bright), we conclude that ptCD56(bright) are activated CD56(bright) that expand while competing with T cells for the elevated post-transplant level of IL-15.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据