4.5 Article

Structural requirements for the interaction of human IgM and IgA with the human Fcα/μ receptor

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 1147-1156

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200839184

关键词

Human Fc alpha/mu receptor; IgA; IgM

资金

  1. Medical Research Council Career Establishment Award [G0300145]
  2. European union Marie Curie Excellence Grant
  3. Antibody Immunotherapy for Malaria [MEXT-CT-2003-509670]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Medical Research Council [G0300145] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0300145] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we unravel the structural features of human IgM and IgA that govern their interaction with the human Fc alpha/mu receptor (hFc alpha/mu R). Ligand polymerization status was crucial for the interaction, because hFc alpha/mu R binding did not occur with monomeric Ab of either class. hFc alpha/mu R bound IgM with an affinity in the nanomolar range, whereas the affinity for dimeric IgA (dIgA) was tenfold lower. Panels of mutant IgM and dIgA were used to identify regions critical for hFc alpha/mu R binding. IgM binding required contributions from both C mu 3 and C mu 4 Fc domains, whereas for dIgA, an exposed loop in the C alpha 3 domain was crucial. This loop, comprising residues Pro440-Phe443, lies at the Fc domain interface and has been implicated in the binding of host receptors Fc alpha RI and polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR), as well as IgA-binding proteins produced by certain pathogenic bacteria. Substitutions within the Pro440-Phe443 loop resulted in loss of hFc alpha/mu R binding. Furthermore, secretory component (SC, the extracellular portion of pIgR) and bacterial IgA-binding proteins were shown to inhibit the dIgA-hFc alpha/mu R interaction. Therefore, we have identified a motif in the IgA-Fc inter-domain region critical for hFc alpha/mu R interaction, and highlighted the multi-functional nature of a key site for protein-protein interaction at the IgA Fc domain interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据