4.5 Article

Containment of aerogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice does not require MyD88 adaptor function for TLR2, -4 and -9

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 680-694

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200736458

关键词

bacterial infection; monocyte/macrophage; Mycobacterium; rodent; TLR

资金

  1. MRC [G0700163] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700163] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0700163] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of Toll-like receptors (TLR) and MyD88 for immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection remains controversial. To address the impact of TLR-mediated pathogen recognition and MyD88-dependent signaling events on anti-mycobacterial host responses, we analyzed the outcome of Mtb infection in TLR2/4/9 triple- and MyD88-deficient mice. After aerosol infection, both TLR2/4/9-deficient and wild-type mice expressed pro-inflammatory cytokines promoting antigen-specific T cells and the production of IFN-gamma to similar extents. Moreover, TLR2/4/9-deficient mice expressed IFN-gamma-dependent inducible nitric oxide synthase and LRG-47 in infected lungs. MyD88-deficient mice expressed pro-inflammatory cytokines and were shown to expand IFN-gamma-producing antigen-specific T cells, albeit in a delayed fashion. Only mice that were deficient for MyD88 rapidly succumbed to unrestrained mycobacterial growth, whereas TLR2/4/9-deficient mice controlled Mtb replication. IFN-gamma-dependent restriction of mycobacterial growth was severely impaired only in Mtb-infected MyD88, but not in TLR2/4/9-deficient bone marrow-derived macrophages. Our results demonstrate that after Mtb infection neither TLR2, -4, and -9, nor MyD88 are required for the induction of adaptive T cell responses. Rather, MyD88, but not TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9, is critical for triggering macrophage effector mechanisms central to anti-mycobacterial defense.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据