4.5 Article

12p13.33 microdeletion including ELKS/ERC1, a new locus associated with childhood apraxia of speech

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 82-88

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.116

关键词

array CGH; 12p13.33; inherited deletion; ELKS/ERC1 gene; speech delay; childhood apraxia of speech (CAS)

资金

  1. Regional Council of Burgundy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Speech sound disorders are heterogeneous conditions, and sporadic and familial cases have been described. However, monogenic inheritance explains only a small proportion of such disorders, in particular in cases with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Deletions of <5 Mb involving the 12p13.33 locus is one of the least commonly deleted subtelomeric regions. Only four patients have been reported with such a deletion diagnosed with fluorescence in situ hybridisation telomere analysis or array CGH. To further delineate this rare microdeletional syndrome, a French collaboration together with a search in the Decipher database allowed us to gather nine new patients with a 12p13.33 subtelomeric or interstitial rearrangement identified by array CGH. Speech delay was found in all patients, which could be defined as CAS when patients had been evaluated by a speech therapist (5/9 patients). Intellectual deficiency was found in 5/9 patients only, and often associated with psychiatric manifestations of various severity. Two such deletions were inherited from an apparently healthy parent, but reevaluation revealed abnormal speech production at least in childhood, suggesting variable expressivity. The ELKS/ERC1 gene, which encodes for a synaptic factor, is found in the smallest region of overlap. These results reinforce the hypothesis that deletions of the 12p13.33 locus may be responsible for variable phenotypes including CAS associated with neurobehavioural troubles and that the presence of CAS justifies a genetic work-up. European Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 21, 82-88; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.116; published online 20 June 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据