4.5 Article

Identification and functional analysis of novel THAP1 mutations

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 171-175

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.159

关键词

dystonia; THAP1; mutation; DNA binding; phenotype-genotype

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LO 1555/3-1]
  2. Volkswagen Foundation
  3. Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation
  4. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in THAP1 have been associated with dystonia 6 (DYT6). THAP1 encodes a transcription factor that represses the expression of DYT1. To further evaluate the mutational spectrum of THAP1 and its associated phenotype, we sequenced THAP1 in 567 patients with focal (n=461), segmental (n=68), or generalized dystonia (n=38). We identified 10 novel variants, including six missense substitutions within the DNA-binding Thanatos-associated protein domain (Arg13His, Lys16Glu, His23Pro, Lys24Glu, Pro26Leu, Ile80Val), a 1bp-deletion downstream of the nuclear localization signal (Asp191Thrfs*9), and three alterations in the untranslated regions. The effect of the missense variants was assessed using prediction tools and luciferase reporter gene assays. This indicated the Ile80Val substitution as a benign variant. The subcellular localization of Asp191Thrfs*9 suggests a disturbed nuclear import for this mutation. Thus, we consider six of the 10 novel variants as pathogenic mutations accounting for a mutation frequency of 1.1%. Mutation carriers presented mainly with early onset dystonia (<12 years in five of six patients). Symptoms started in an arm or neck and spread to become generalized in three patients or segmental in two patients. Speech was affected in four mutation carriers. In conclusion, THAP1 mutations are rare in unselected dystonia patients and functional analysis is necessary to distinguish between benign variants and pathogenic mutations. European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 171-175; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.159; published online 17 August 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据